| 
 The modern Imperial
Japanese Navy battlefleet commenced with the construction of the battlecruiser
Kongo in 1911, followed by Japan’s first superdreadnought, Fuso, in 1912.
The initial emphasis on capital ships was both a response to an escalating
naval race between the leading naval powers, and as the principal instruments
of Japan’s Mahanian strategy of the decisive naval engagement. However,
the concentration on capitol ships meant a minimum focus on lighter escorts.  
Belatedly, the Imperial General Staff, which set Japanese naval construction
and design requirements, authorized new classes of first-class destroyers
to augment their capital ships under their “Eight-Eight” program (modified
to the “Eight -Four” program) during the latter years of WWI. The new destroyer
designs emphasized greater speed, firepower, range, and quality. Construction
of the first units commenced just as the First World War approached its
end.
Speed was the major driving consideration as most new capital ships,
particularly the battlecruisers, were projected to feature speeds over
30 knots. Almost none of the existing Japanese destroyer designs was up
to the task. By the time the Washington Naval Disarmament Conference of
1922 convened, three new, capable classes of destroyer had been completed
for the IJN, each an incremental improvement over the proceeding class.
The Mutsuki class of twelve ships was the last of these classes. 
 Design
 Up through mid-World War 1, Japanese destroyer development had been
closely linked to Royal Navy practices. As that war progressed, attention
was also paid to German destroyer design. As a result, the initial class
of new IJN destroyers, the Minekazes, incorporated a number of new features
first seen in the German designs, including a lengthened, turtle-backed
forecastle and the main armament set high on the centerline.
 In the new class, four single 12cm/4.7inch gun mounts comprised the
main armament, along with three sets of twin 53cm/21inch torpedo tubes.
One torpedo mount was set behind the forecastle in a well deck in front
of the bridge, the other two placed further aft of the funnels. More powerful,
turbine driven engines for higher speed were installed, which also enabled
greater range. When completed, the new Minekazes were considered the equal
of foreign contemporary destroyers. 
 The second class of new destroyers, the Kamikazes, tweaked the original
design with a strengthened bridge structure and a wider bean for greater
stability. Some re-arrangement of the deckhouse and main armament occurred
as well in the last few units. There were subtle tweaks to the main armament
shielding as well.
 The Mutsukis, the last class of new destroyers, were tweaked yet again.
A new bow form, referred to as a double spooned bow, was incorporated,
along with more flare to help with seakeeping. Beam and draft were again
slightly enlarged, better to accommodate a new, heavier torpedo armament.
 For the first time in a Japanese ship, 61cm/24” torpedoes were installed,
in two new triple tube mounts. Reloads for six torpedoes were also provided
for. More depth charges were added to the stern. Some ships were equipped
with minelaying rails, while others were equipped with minesweeping paravanes.
Engine machinery remained the same as the proceeding class with 38,500shp
and a top speed of just over 37 knots. Range remained the same, that of
3,600nm at 14 knots.
 All class members underwent reconstruction between 1935 and 1937 as
a result of issues with structural weaknesses exhibited by some vessels
during damaging encounters with typhoons. The hull and bridge were reinforced,
and the bridge reduced in width, made more aerodynamic, and given a steel
roof. An RDF loop and compartment were added aft. The funnel tops were
raked back and the torpedo tube mounts were enclosed by a weather and splinter
proof shield. A twin 13mm AA mount aft of number two funnel was added to
most units as well. Overall displacement increased, and top speed was reduced
to 32.5 knots. A degaussing cable was added to the outside of the hull
just prior to the beginning of hostilities in 1941. 
 Eventually, new destroyer designs beginning with the succeeding Fubuki
type rendered the Minekaze and Kamikaze classes obsolete by the mid-1930s.
Most of these ships were subsequently assigned secondary duties. The enlarged
and improved torpedo batteries of the Mutsukis were seen as an asset, and
these ships were retained as first line ships at the outset of the Pacific
war. 
 Brief History
 Mutsuki (?? January Moon) was laid down at the Sasebo Naval Dockyard
as Destroyer #19 on May, 21, 1924. She was launched on July 23, 1925 and
completed on March 25, 1926. After commissioning, she became flagship of
the 30th Destroyer Division. She was renamed Mutsuki in 1928. 
 Mutsuki was heavily damaged in the 4th Fleet Incident of Sept, 1935,
when she and many other ships encountered a severe typhoon. Her bridge
face was completely smashed, her captain killed, and the ship lost steering.
Thankfully, emergency steering was quickly restored and the ship saved.
She subsequently underwent reconstruction and modernization. Afterwards,
Mutsuki and DesDiv 30 participated in numerous landings and provided fire
support during various operations in Chinese coastal waters in the late
1930s.
 She was active from the outset of the Pacific war, participating in
the invasions of Wake Island, the Solomon Islands, Rabaul, New Ireland,
New Britain, Lae, Salamua, and the Shortland Islands; all by the end of
April, 1942. Sprinkled among the invasions was a number of convoy escort
missions in conjunction with her division. Of note was a brief period of
maintenance at Truk, where she had a small sponson added forward of her
bridge and a twin 13mm mount added on the starboard side.
 In May, she and DesDiv 30 escorted the troop convoy tasked with the
invasion of Port Moresby as part of Operation MO. However, the concurrent
Battle of the Coral Sea stymied that intent. The invasion was postponed
after the clash, as the withdrawal of the IJN’s carrier force eliminated
air cover for the invasion force. Without air cover, the convoy was now
clearly vulnerable to enemy air attack and ordered to return to base at
Rabaul.
 Afterwards, there was a lull in activity, save for some new escort missions.
Eventually, in late June, Mutsuki escorted a ship loaded with a construction
battaMutsuki to Tulagi in the Solomon Islands, across from Guadalcanal,
in order to begin construction of an airfield. She then reported to Sasebo
Naval Base in mid-July for a refit and maintenance, which was completed
by mid-August. While there, the division was re-assigned to Eighth Fleet,
newly created to support operations around Guadalcanal and New Guinea.
 After completion of the refit, Mutsuki and DesDiv 30 joined those forces
at Rabaul and the Shortland Islands. In early August, US forces had invaded
Guadalcanal, and 8th Fleet became the focus of Japanese naval efforts to
dislodge the Americans. On the evening of August 24th, Mutsuki joined division-mate
Yayoi and three other destroyers in bombarding the newly established, American-held
airfield known as Henderson Field on Guadalcanal. This happened to be one
of the initial actions that were part of what became known as the Battle
of the Eastern Solomons. Elsewhere, opposing forces had engaged this same
day in a series of damaging carrier actions, with both sides subsequently
withdrawing their carrier forces from the scene. 
 On the following morning of the 25th, Mutsuki and her bombardment companions
were made part of a large cruiser and destroyer escort to a small troop
reinforcement convoy commanded by Rear Admiral Raizo Tanaka. The convoy
itself was composed of three transports and several patrol boats, all carrying
men to be landed on Guadalcanal. However, the bombardment of Henderson
Field by Mutsuki and her consorts the night before had been mostly ineffective,
leaving American air power based on the field mostly intact. Several of
those aircraft subsequently attacked the convoy and its escorts during
mid-morning, damaging both the convoy flagship, CL Jintsu, and one of the
transports. Mutsuki pulled alongside the damaged transport Kinryu Maru
to take off her crew and embarked troops.
 It was then that four US Army Air Force B-17s from Espiritu Santo arrived
overhead and proceeded to make a bomb run over the two motionless ships.
Mutsuki’s captain elected to keep his ship alongside Kinryu Maru to continue
the evacuation. Several bombs hit on or around the ships, with at least
one direct hit in Mutsuki’s engineering spaces. She quickly sank, with
41 dead (including the captain) and 11 injured. Division sister Yayoi took
off her survivors as well as those of Kinryu Maru. After scuttling the
transport with a torpedo, Yayoi took the survivors back to base in the
Shortland Islands.  | 
| The
Triumph Models IJN Mutsuki
 Triumph’s new Mutsuki kit is actually not the first
1/350 version of the class on the market. A.B.&K Models, a Ukrainian
company mostly known for supplying some aircraft and aircraft accessories,
released their own resin version in August 2024. I don’t know much about
it, other than it was prohibitively expensive and in very limited supply.
The beauty shots I saw on Hobby Search Japan showed a decent kit, but more
than that I could not say other than it’s almost impossible to find one
on the market.
 Triumph Models is a Chinese model manufacturer
that’s been around for several years now, focusing on various scales of
armor, figures, and 1/700 resin ships. They’ve also been producing ship
accessories in 1/350 scale utilizing 3D printing. Now, Triumph has chosen
Mutsuki as their first full ship kit to be released in 1/350 scale. 
 Note that this kit is offered in one of four configurations:
Full hull or waterline, standard or deluxe. The standard versions contain
a resin hull and 3D printed parts. The deluxe versions offer the same,
plus a comprehensive set of photoetch and a deck mask. This review kit
happens to be the full hull, deluxe kit. 
 The kit hull is cast a very light grey resin. Everything
else is either a 3D printed part, or photoetch, or turned brass. There
are twenty-four print rafts; numerous smaller parts are contained on thirteen
rafts printed in black while eleven larger rafts containing superstructural
or weapons related items printed in orange.
 The kit art and contents mark this as Mutsuki,
late 1941. However, right out of the box, this kit could be built as any
of the first eight sisters (those with mine rails at the stern) after modernization.
The fit is typical of this class immediately prior to the outset of the
war through mid-1942 for most of those eight sisters. Some of Triumph’s
marketing beauty shots show some plated over portholes, but that would
not be correct for an early war fit.   | 
| 
 The hull comes
is cast as a full hull, one-piece hull. There’s a hefty pour riser along
the bottom of its keel that will have to be cut off. The “double spoon”
bow profile is very good, with the bottom portion jutting forward of the
vertical axis by just a hair. The pointed portion of the prow may be a
millimeter or so short, but it’s not truly noticeable. There is some resin
flashing at the bow, but it’s easily removed. The edges of the forecastle
deck are properly turtle-backed in shape.  
The casting
is extremely sharp, with hull plating, portholes and eyebrows, bilge keels,
propeller shaft glands, and placement recesses for the prop shaft brackets
and rudder. The forecastle and main decks come with treading, molded brass
tie-down strips for the linoleum covered areas, spurnwaters, torpedo trolley
rails, and recesses for superstructure and equipment placements. A degaussing
cable is included separately as part of the photoetch, so building the
kit as a pre-war version is a viable option. All the details are very sharply
molded, and I’m very impressed by the quality of the casting.  
On the other
hand, the hull is not issue-free. Most glaring is that this particular
hull came noticeably bowed. (see photo with the hull posed against a straight
edge ruler).  Admittedly, I have not contacted Triumph about a replacement,
so I do not know how responsive Triumph might prove to be in a case like
this. Hopefully, this is an exception and not the rule. There’s no twist
or bend in the hull, so it’s likely that a hot water bath treatment will
be sufficient to straighten the hull. 
 The other concern
is overstated plating. It’s undeniably over-scale and a comparison
of the kit hull with a photo of Mutsuki lays this out clearly. The kit
plating throws noticeable shadows around it, whereas any shadow cast by
the real thing was minimal and only evident with overhead light. 
 These days,
there seems to be a trend in ship kits at maximizing detail as a means
of expressing quality, even if it’s overstated.  There will be many
who won’t be bothered by this at all, but for an admitted rivet counter
like me, it’s clearly overdone.  It’s possible that a coat of paint
might diminish the effect, and it will certainly be less evident for those
who purchase a waterline hull. 
 The kit hull
dimensions scale out reasonably well. Mutsuki’s particulars versus the
scale and kit:
                                    
Actual                         
1/350 calculated                    
1/350 actual
 Overall
Length:           102.72m/337’             
293.49mm                              
289.0mm*
 Waterline
Length:        100.2m/328’7”            
286.29mm                              
286.0 mm
 Beam:                         
9.16m/30’1”               
26.17mm                                 
25.5mm
 *A straightened
hull would likely add 0.5+mm of length.   | 
| 
 Similarly
listed below. These carry the smaller parts and fittings, usually in multiples.
Some parts may be difficult to identify at first, but most are reasonably
straightforward. As with the orange 3D printed parts, these pieces seem
uniformly sharp, properly shaped and scaled. 
·Two
sets of anchor chains  
·Air
& cowl intakes, smokescreen dispensers 
 ·Depth
charge 
 ·K
guns, hawser reel centers, assorted deck equipment 
 ·Boat
davits, port forward torpedo reload girders, possibly unused racks 
 ·Ship’s
boats (two 6m cutters and on 6m motor launch) 
 ·Bollards,
bitts, fairleads, depth charge racks, deck hatches, etc. 
 ·Handwheels,
12cm binoculars, voice tubes, handling davits, cannisters, etc. 
 ·Anchors,
capstan, 60cm searchlight, maneuvering light, winches, boxes, etc. 
 ·Main
battery shields, 2m rangefinder, compass bridge deck roof 
 ·Mine
rails, main battery bandstand supports, access ladders 
 ·Anchors,
rudder, props, prop shaft brackets 
 ·Twin
35mm AA, 7.5mm MG   | 
| The deluxe kit(s) come with three
comprehensive frets of PE. 
 Fret A contains all the railings for the ship,
the rails for the torpedo trolley cart, two sets of mine rails/channels
for the stern, access ladders for the bridge, jackstaffs, bridge mounted
lookout stations, ladders for the masts, and few other small parts. 
 Fret B holds numerous parts for a degaussing cable,
brass alternative version of the bandstand support trusses, an RDF antenna
and tripod, fans for the smoke screen dispensers, and three strips that
I cannot identify. 
 Fret C holds numerous doors, hatches, porthole
rims with eyebrows, and covers for sealing portholes. The covers would
not be used on a ship in early war fit but would be applicable to a late
war version. 
 There are two smaller frets as well. One carries
brass yard arms and pulley shapes for those yardarms. 
 The other contains a sponson extension for the
starboard side of Mutsuki’s bridge. It was added at Truk in January, 1942
to accommodate a twin 13mm AA mounting. The instructions cite August, 1942,
as the date of addition but that’s incorrect. It added a slight asymmetrical
dimension to the front of the bridge and was present when Mutsuki sank
that August.   |